Case Results

Fourth DUI Case in New York Legal Defense Resulting in a Suspended Sentence

A fourth DUI arrest in New York places a defendant at the highest level of criminal exposure, as the state treats repeat intoxicated driving as one of the most serious public safety risks. Even so, sentencing is not automatic. New York courts retain discretion to consider individualized circumstances, evidence of rehabilitation, and the overall context of the incident.This case study explains how a client with three prior DUI convictions faced a fourth DUI charge and, through a detailed mitigation strategy and strict compliance efforts, obtained a suspended sentence rather than immediate incarceration.The case illustrates that even in repeat offense DUI matters, strategic advocacy and strong rehabilitative evidence can significantly influence the ultimate outcome when framed appropriately under New York’s legal framework.

File Stalking Charges Case | Washington D.C. Attorney Achieves No File Decision

A Washington D.C. defense attorney was retained to represent a client who faced allegations that could have escalated into formal charges under the District’s stalking statutes. Because file stalking charges matters in Washington D.C. involve heightened scrutiny by law enforcement, the attorney initiated an early stage intervention to prevent the case from advancing to prosecution. In the District, decisions to file stalking charges are heavily fact dependent, and investigators assess intent, repetition, and whether the conduct caused reasonable fear as defined under D.C. Code § 22-3133. This case explains how a Washington D.C. attorney prevented the government from proceeding with formal charges despite the complainant’s allegations and initial investigation.

Forgery Case in Washington, D.C. – Humanitarian Motive, No Conviction

This case study examines how an office manager in a small company in Washington, D.C. faced a criminal investigation for Forgery after altering government tax-clearance documents to help foreign workers extend their visas.The client believed he was acting out of compassion, but his decision led to allegations of Forgery, uttering a forged document, and immigration-related violations.Because Forgery involving government certificates is treated as a serious offense under D.C. criminal law, the client was terrified that a single mistake would permanently destroy his career and reputation.With careful legal counseling and a structured defense strategy, however, the Forgery charges were eventually dismissed, and only a minor immigration-related penalty remained.

Data Breach Case in New York Attorney Support for Former Employee Accused of Misusing Client Information

When a former employee is accused of misappropriating customer data after resigning from a business in New York, the matter can quickly escalate into a criminal data breach case or an allegation of unlawful use of a computer, theft of trade secrets, or unfair competition. These allegations frequently arise in industries where client relationships drive revenue, such as wellness, beauty services, consulting, hospitality, and personal care businesses. In this case, our firm represented a former aesthetic therapist who faced criminal investigation for allegedly transferring client contact information to benefit a competitor after her resignation. By conducting a precise statutory analysis under New York law and presenting evidence that contradicted the complainant’s assertions, we successfully secured a no prosecution determination, preventing the case from advancing into criminal court and avoiding any risk of incarceration or criminal record. This data breach case illustrates how factual reconstruction, evidentiary auditing, and legal positioning are essential when defending individuals wrongfully accused of exploiting customer data in violation of New York statutory and common law doctrines.