Case Results

Workplace Bullying in New York Attorney Led Resolution

Workplace bullying can severely damage an employee’s mental health and professional stability especially when the conduct is carried out by a supervisor who holds clear power over the employee. In New York such behavior is often addressed through internal agency investigations employment law violations and union grievance procedures even though New York does not have a standalone workplace bullying statute.This case study illustrates how our firm represented a New York public employee who suffered persistent exclusion verbal humiliation and retaliatory behavior from a direct supervisor. Through strategic documentation mental health evidence and a targeted legal response the attorney team achieved a formal demotion sanction against the harasser.

24 Hour Legal Advice | Non-Prosecution Achieved With SJKP

When individuals unknowingly become entangled in sophisticated financial scams, the legal consequences can be severe even when there was no intent to participate in wrongdoing. This case study illustrates how immediate 24 Hour Legal Advice protected an innocent Washington, D.C. resident from wrongful criminal liability.The client had no criminal history and urgently needed tuition funds for a dependent child. After receiving what appeared to be a legitimate loan message, he followed instructions to create a new bank account and provide verification information steps he believed were part of a standard lending process.Within hours, the bank froze his account and notified him that it was under investigation for possible fraud. With police questioning scheduled the next morning and the weekend limiting normal legal access he sought 24 Hour Legal Advice, receiving emergency representation that ultimately led to a non-prosecution (no papering / no charge) decision.

Best Corporate Attorney Washington DC Offshore Refinancing

A team led by the best corporate attorney in Washington D.C. advised a consortium of international lenders in connection with the $780 million refinancing of an offshore production, storage, and offloading vessel (“the Vessel”), operating under a long-term charter in West Africa. The refinancing required a comprehensive review of District of Columbia corporate governance rules, cross border collateral arrangements, and lender protection structures adapted to the Business Corporation Act of 2010, codified in D.C. Code Title 29. Because the borrower group utilized a multi tier holding structure headquartered in Washington D.C., the transaction also required careful compliance with voting power authorization mechanics under D.C. Code §§ 29-304.21 and 29-309.04, which regulate approval thresholds for significant asset backed financing events. The legal team structured the refinancing to support the borrower’s broader capital recycling strategy, enabling future investment in next generation marine energy infrastructure while ensuring lenders received enhanced security rights compliant with federal maritime finance standards. This case study outlines how a D.C. based corporate practice navigated statutory corporate authority requirements, antitrust considerations, and lender coordination frameworks to deliver a successful closing.

Criminal Law Firm New York City SexualAssault No Prosecution

A criminal law firm in New York City frequently represents individuals confronted with serious sexual assault allegations in which the issue of consent determines whether prosecutors can sustain charges under New York Penal Law Article 130. Allegations involving a supposed lack of consent, even without physical force, expose a client to severe consequences, including potential felony prosecution, incarceration, sex offender registration, and long term collateral harm in education, employment, and immigration matters. Because New York prosecutors must establish lack of consent beyond a reasonable doubt, early intervention is critical to identify factual inconsistencies, behavioral evidence, and objective documentation that undermine the complainant’s narrative. In this case, a criminal law firm in New York City represented a university student who faced accusations of sexual assault after a consensual encounter that the complainant later portrayed as non consensual.