Skip to main content

call now

Search Menu
  • About
  • lawyers
  • practices
  • Insights
  • Case Results
  • Notice
  • Locations
contact us

Copyright SJKP LLP Law Firm all rights reserved

AccessibilityCookie StatementDisclaimersLegal NoticePrivacy PolicyTerms & Conditions
BROCHURE DOWNLOAD

U.S.

New York
Washington, D.C.

Asia

Seoul
Busan
BROCHURE DOWNLOAD

© 2025 SJKP, LLP
All rights reserved. Attorney Advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

BROCHURE DOWNLOAD
Book a Consultation
Online
Phone
CLICK TO START YOUR CONSULTATION
Online
Phone

  1. Home

Case Results

Based on our recently accumulated litigation database, we provide customized solutions based on a thoroughly analyzed litigation database.

Showing 1570 of 1571 results.

09 Dec, 2025

Experienced Car Accident Attorney Washington DC Hit Run

A hit and run allegation in Washington D.C. can quickly escalate into a criminal investigation that exposes a driver to misdemeanor charges, possible jail time, and administrative penalties. Under D.C. Code § 50-2201.05c, a driver involved in a collision must stop, provide identification, and offer reasonable assistance when injury or property damage occurs. When these obligations are questioned, prosecutors may view the matter as a potential “Leaving After Colliding” offense. In this case study, an experienced car accident attorney in Washington D.C. represented a delivery rider accused of leaving the scene after an alleged collision with another motorcyclist. Through a structured evidentiary review, legal analysis of statutory duties, and strategic presentation to investigators, counsel secured a Non-Prosecution (No-Papering) outcome, allowing the client to avoid criminal charges and preserve his employment.This case illustrates how early intervention from an experienced car accident attorney can shift the outcome dramatically when a misunderstanding or disputed contact is mistaken for a criminal hit and run offense.

DWI, DUI & Personal Injury
Non Prosecution
09 Dec, 2025

Internet Defamation, Build Strong Against Online Harassment

Understanding Internet Defamation is essential for creators and public figures facing widespread online harassment. In this New York case, a livestreamer became the target of escalating defamatory comments from anonymous users. What began as simple insults soon expanded into attacks on the client’s family, causing severe emotional distress.Recognizing that proper evidence collection was essential to pursuing an Internet Defamation claim, the client contacted a law firm equipped with a dedicated digital forensics unit. Through structured forensic analysis, attorneys gathered hundreds of data points, preserved volatile materials, and prepared litigation-ready documentation. This case illustrates how digital forensics can decisively strengthen Internet Defamation actions.

Criminal Law
win a case
09 Dec, 2025

Sports Law Attorney Near Me Contract Advisory

Professional athletes in Washington D.C. often rely on exclusive representation agreements to manage media appearances, sponsorships, and negotiation activities. When an agency fails to fulfill these obligations, the athlete may consider contract termination, which requires careful review under District contract principles. This case study explains how a sports law attorney near me provided structured legal advisory services to an internationally recognized athlete facing agency mismanagement and financial irregularities.

Others
Legal Advisory
09 Dec, 2025

Defamation Fine | Resolved a Workplace Rumor Case

Understanding how a Defamation Fine can arise in New York is essential in workplace rumor cases, where casual comments can escalate into serious legal disputes. In this case study, a software developer at a New York City tech company made reckless statements about a coworker and team leader, leading to a formal defamation claim and an internal investigation.The employee feared job loss, a substantial Defamation Fine, and long-term reputational harm. With the help of an experienced New York defamation attorney, he admitted wrongdoing, expressed genuine remorse, and followed a structured corrective plan. As a result, the dispute was resolved with only a modest Defamation Fine level settlement and internal discipline without litigation or criminal exposure.

Criminal Law
fine
239240241242243