Case Results

Business Attorney Washington DC Directors Authority Denied

In Washington D.C., disputes over corporate governance frequently arise when shareholders challenge the validity of a meeting, the legitimacy of proxies, or the accuracy of vote tabulation under the District’s Business Corporation Act. In this case, a business attorney represented directors whose authority was challenged through an emergency motion seeking to suspend their duties while a related lawsuit was pending. The shareholders claimed that the special shareholder meeting contained procedural irregularities, including improper verification of proxies and unreliable vote counting. The business attorney demonstrated that the meeting complied with all statutory requirements, that independent observers supervised the process, and that no evidence of imminent harm justified judicial intervention. Ultimately, the Superior Court denied the motion, allowing the directors to continue performing their duties throughout the litigation.

Corporate Attorney New York City Dismisses Embezzlement

A corporate attorney New York City is often retained when a business client faces allegations that threaten financial stability and corporate reputation.In this case, a construction company sought help after being sued for approximately $150,000 in alleged corporate embezzlement.The claim arose from a dispute with a subcontracting supervisor.Because the lawsuit carried both civil liability risks and potential criminal exposure, the corporate attorney New York City immediately initiated a structured defense.The attorney clarified the contractual relationships, disproved any fiduciary breach, and demonstrated that no misappropriation had occurred.

General Counsel Services: Preventing Criminal Liability

This case study illustrates how comprehensive general counsel services can protect business owners facing complex workplace safety investigations in Washington. The matter involved a severe industrial accident, extensive regulatory scrutiny, and parallel civil and criminal exposure. By integrating strategic legal defenses across all proceedings, the defense team successfully prevented the imposition of criminal liability.

Assault and Battery Attorney Ends in Not-Guilty

When a roommate argument turns physical and both sides file criminal complaints, the situation can quickly spiral without an experienced Assault and Battery Attorney.In this Washington, D.C. case study, the client initially called the police after being attacked by his intoxicated roommate, only to later receive his own assault summons based on a counter-complaint.The stakes were high because a conviction for assault under D.C. Code § 22-404 can carry up to 180 days in jail and a criminal record that affects housing and employment.Thanks to a focused defense strategy led by an Assault and Battery Attorney, the client ultimately received a not-guilty verdict and was able to move forward without a conviction.