Case Results

Shareholder dispute lawyer preserved corporate stability

Shareholder disputes often escalate when founders, directors, or major shareholders fundamentally disagree on governance, meeting procedures, or control of the company. In Washington, D.C., the validity of a shareholder meeting or resolution is governed by the D.C. Business Corporation Act, which details how shareholder meetings must be called, how notice must be provided, and when a resolution may be challenged or voided. When a challenge seeks cancellation of a shareholder resolution, courts also consider whether subsequent actions—such as properly authorized ratification—eliminate the practical benefit of litigation.

Consortium Agreement Corporate Finance Legal Advisory

This case study describes how corporate counsel supported a multi-investor consortium in negotiating and executing a consortium agreement for the acquisition of convertible bonds issued by a publicly listed company. The consortium was composed of several institutional investors, including major private equity managers, and required full-scope legal guidance from initial structuring through post-investment strategy. Because the transaction involved convertible bond acquisition linked to strategic control, governance restructuring, and long-term financing needs, the legal team provided end-to-end services to ensure compliance with New York corporate finance principles.Throughout the matter, the consortium agreement served as the central framework that governed investor alignment, risk allocation, voting arrangements, and negotiation strategy with lenders, bond issuers, and other stakeholders. This comprehensive advisory ensured that the consortium maintained unified decision-making and avoided intra-investor conflicts.

Public Indecency Fine Washington DC Reduced Penalty Defense

Public indecency allegations in Washington D.C. can lead to severe criminal consequences, reputational damage, and employment related sanctions, particularly for public employees whose conduct is closely scrutinized. This case study examines how a structured defense strategy transformed a potentially career ending indecent exposure accusation into a manageable outcome resulting only in a public indecency fine. Although District law allows prosecutors to pursue more serious penalties, the defense team successfully demonstrated the absence of malicious intent, emphasized mitigation factors, and persuaded the authorities to apply a limited fine instead of more punitive measures. This analysis highlights how experience, context driven advocacy, and early intervention can be decisive in reshaping the trajectory of a public indecency case in Washington D.C.

False Accusation of Sexual Assault: Secured a Full Dismissal

Facing a False Accusation of Sexual Assault in New York can destroy a person’s life overnight. In a densely crowded city where misunderstandings escalate quickly, individuals may suddenly find themselves targeted by serious allegations despite having no criminal intent.In this case, a New York client sought legal help after a misunderstanding in a busy pedestrian area led to a False Accusation of Sexual Assault, raising fears of permanent reputational and legal harm.Through digital forensics, movement analysis, and structured legal advocacy, the defense team proved the accusation was unfounded resulting in a no-charge dismissal.