Case Results

Gambling Legislation DC Self Reporting Non Prosecution

This case study examines how a Washington, D.C., resident involved in online gambling activity voluntarily disclosed his conduct before receiving any investigative notice and, through structured legal guidance, achieved a non prosecution result. Washington, D.C., enforces unlawful gambling provisions with attention to the financial patterns often associated with unregulated wagering, especially when account activity reflects irregular or high risk transactions from a compliance perspective. In District practice, early cooperation and credible self reporting can influence charging decisions, as prosecutors often consider intent, harm, and rehabilitative efforts when assessing marginal or low-level gambling violations. The present matter demonstrates how self reporting, complete financial documentation, and evidence of rehabilitation helped authorities understand the conduct as isolated personal betting rather than activity connected to a broader gambling operation. It also reflects the discretionary nature of charging decisions in non violent gambling related matters, where prosecutors may decline formal action if the individual demonstrates remorse, minimal financial gain, and clear indicators against future misconduct.

Advertising Contract Disputes in Washington D.C. Compliance

Environmental marketing claims have become a significant corporate risk area in Washington D.C., where businesses must comply with the D.C. Consumer Protection Procedures Act (CPPA), the Federal Trade Commission Act, and the FTC Green Guides.Companies entering an advertising contract are expected to verify that marketing statements are truthful, substantiated, and free from misleading implications, especially with respect to environmental benefits.This case study describes how a D.C.-based consumer goods manufacturer faced a federal investigation over unsubstantiated “natural” and “eco-friendly” claims and how legal counsel intervened to resolve the matter and redesign the company’s advertising contract and internal compliance system.Through this example, corporate teams can better understand the intersection of environmental advertising, federal regulatory obligations, and the legal duties embedded in an advertising contract.

Corporate Litigation Defense Against Advisory Fee Claims

In Washington D.C., disputes over advisory fees in cross border financing projects frequently escalate into corporate litigation, particularly when a borrower challenges the necessity or proportionality of the lender’s compensation. This case concerns a financial institution that provided multi layered advisory and loan arrangement services in an overseas infrastructure project and later faced a lawsuit demanding the return of advisory and arrangement fees. The following case study explains how the defense team demonstrated the legitimacy of the institution’s compensation structure under D.C. commercial principles, leading to a full dismissal of all claims.

Payment Settlement Disputes in New York Case

Payment settlement issues frequently arise in New York’s construction industry, where contractors must navigate strict contractual obligations, progress-based billing structures, and the state’s legal framework governing commercial construction.When a developer or project owner delays or refuses payment, contractors often face immediate financial strain affecting labor, materials, and scheduling.In many cases, these disputes trigger litigation, mechanic’s liens, or claims for breach of contract.Because New York law places a strong emphasis on contract terms and documented performance, proper evidence and strategy are essential.A skilled construction and corporate attorney can guide contractors through the payment settlement process, ensuring compliance with New York rules while protecting outstanding receivables.