Case Results

Marriage Fraud Defense Attorney in New York Case

Marriage Fraud allegations in the United States can trigger both criminal exposure and severe immigration consequences, including denial of status, removal proceedings, and federal prosecution. Because even minor misunderstandings in a relationship can be misinterpreted as fraud, early legal intervention is essential. In this case, our Marriage Fraud defense team at SJKP successfully protected a client who was wrongfully accused of entering a relationship for immigration benefits, leading authorities to close the investigation with no charges filed. The following case study outlines how the allegations arose, how the defense strategy was structured, and how the client ultimately secured a favorable outcome.

Breach of Fiduciary Duty Defense Case Non Prosecution

In Washington D.C., allegations involving breach of fiduciary duty and fraud can quickly escalate into criminal exposure when prosecutors believe an individual has misused an employer’s business information or acted outside their authorized role to obtain financial gain. These cases often hinge on whether a fiduciary relationship existed, whether the accused had the legal authority to act, and whether any provable intent to defraud can be established. In this case, legal counsel successfully demonstrated the absence of fiduciary obligations and fraudulent intent, resulting in a full declination of charges by the D.C. prosecutor’s office.

Breach of Trust Attorney Embezzlement Allegations Dismissed

This case study explains how a seasoned breach of trust attorney in New York successfully defended a former logistics employee wrongfully accused of embezzlement and breach of fiduciary duty after leaving his position. The client previously worked in the sales division of a global maritime transport company and was accused of withholding shipping payments and improperly issuing Bills of Lading (B/L). Throughout the matter, the breach of trust attorney focused on disproving the allegations by presenting transparent communication records, established internal practices, and evidence showing the absence of personal gain.The case highlights how New York law evaluates intent, corporate procedures, and the presence—or absence—of financial benefit when determining whether a former employee committed criminal wrongdoing related to trust or fiduciary obligations.

Theft Fines Defense Case Fine

A theft accusation in Washington D.C. can escalate rapidly into a serious criminal matter because District law treats even relatively low value property offenses as crimes that may carry both incarceration exposure and significant theft fines. In this case, a defendant charged with misdemeanor theft was initially concerned that the facts alleged by the complainant would justify a custodial sentence under D.C. Code § 22-3211, which criminalizes the unlawful taking of another person’s property with the intent to deprive the owner of its value. Although jail is not mandatory for first time misdemeanor theft, courts in Washington D.C. evaluate a range of aggravating factors including denial of responsibility, premeditation, and impact on the victim, all of which can increase the likelihood that theft fines or even suspended incarceration will be imposed. Legal counsel became essential when the defendant realized that his earlier denial during the investigative stage could be viewed negatively by the court, and maintaining a coherent mitigation strategy was necessary to avoid harsher penalties.