Case Results

Corporate Counsel Cross Border Contract Dispute Prevention

A Washington D.C. based corporation preparing for an international distribution agreement sought legal support to prevent foreseeable contract disputes, strengthen negotiation leverage, and ensure enforceability under District contract principles. The company faced a draft agreement written entirely in favor of the foreign distributor, raising concerns about unilateral termination rights, excessive liquidated damages, intellectua property exposure, and unfavorable dispute resolution terms. Corporate counsel conducted a comprehensive risk audit, identifying clauses that could significantly impair the client’s legal and commercial position if executed without modification. Through structured advisory, corporate counsel in Washington D.C. recalibrated the contract architecture, ensured compliance with applicable District laws, and provided negotiation strategies tailored for cross border transactions.

DUI Lawyer Case Result No Intent Drunk Driving Allegation

In New York, DUI charges are governed primarily by the Vehicle and Traffic Law, which requires proof that an individual “operated” a motor vehicle while intoxicated. However, operation requires more than simply being inside a running vehicle. It demands evidence of a conscious, voluntary act of control. This case illustrates how a DUI lawyer successfully demonstrated the absence of intent to operate a vehicle, resulting in a full dismissal of charges.The client had fallen asleep inside his parked vehicle, with the engine running solely for air conditioning, and the car unexpectedly rolled forward on a slight incline, causing a minor collision. Despite the high blood alcohol level, the legal team proved there was no voluntary operation of the vehicle, shifting the legal analysis away from intoxication and toward physical causation.This case demonstrates how critical factual reconstruction and a precise understanding of New York DUI requirements are in defending unjustly accused individuals.

Fraud Punishment Defense Case in Washington, D.C.

Washington, D.C. is a jurisdiction that treats Fraud and large scale financial deception with serious criminal exposure, especially when alleged losses exceed six figures. In this case, we examine how our defense team responded to a multi million dollar Fraud investigation initiated in the District. Three defendants were accused of soliciting substantial investment funds across several business ventures and allegedly misrepresenting their intent and financial capacity.Through strategic intervention, early submission of exculpatory evidence, and a focus on the absence of fraudulent intent, our firm successfully obtained a “No Further Action / Case Closed” determination at the police investigation stage.

Auto Insurance Fraud Allegations: Non Prosecution Secured

In New York, allegations of auto insurance fraud can quickly escalate into a criminal investigation involving both insurance companies and law enforcement. Accusations often rely on circumstantial patterns rather than direct proof of intent, which makes early legal intervention critical. This case study examines how a New York insurance attorney defended a client who was accused of staging collisions to obtain improper insurance payouts. The attorney demonstrated lack of intent, absence of a fraudulent motive, and a factual timeline inconsistent with deliberate wrongdoing, ultimately leading to a non prosecution decision by the district attorney.