Case Results

Negligent Homicide Charge | Industrial Accident Defense

A Negligent Homicide Charge in New York often arises from workplace accidents where safety protocols, training, and operational supervision are questioned after a fatal incident.This case study examines how an industrial site manager faced a Negligent Homicide Charge following the death of a worker who deviated from standard safety procedures.By conducting a full investigation, obtaining technical records, and securing a strong mitigation package, the defense team successfully reduced the client's exposure and achieved a favorable sentence.This case highlights the importance of early legal intervention for any employer or supervisor facing a Negligent Homicide Charge involving industrial machinery.

Fair Trade Advisory on Disclosure and Risk Management

A corporation operating in Washington D.C. sought legal advice after internal compliance personnel identified potential issues concerning disclosure obligations under the District’s fair trade and competition framework. The inquiry centered on whether the company’s reporting practices satisfied the transparency obligations embedded in D.C. regulatory rules, federal antitrust principles, and fair trade expectations for large business groups. Because businesses operating in the District are subject to strict scrutiny when their size, structure, or market influence may impact competitive fairness, the corporate client sought a comprehensive compliance review. The company’s principal question was whether omissions in certain public reporting categories could expose the organization to penalty risk and whether corrective action could mitigate such exposure under applicable laws.

Franchise Agreement New York Franchise Owner Legal Support

For more than a decade a New York franchise owner successfully operated a quick service restaurant under a long standing franchise agreement, yet the stability of the business was suddenly threatened when the franchisor issued an unexpected notice refusing to renew the franchise agreement at the scheduled renewal date. Although the franchisee had complied with all operational standards and maintained satisfactory store performance, the franchisor asserted broad contractual discretion and attempted to effectively terminate the relationship through non renewal without identifying a substantial breach or legitimate business justification. Facing the loss of a business that had taken years to build, the franchise owner sought legal assistance to determine whether the non renewal violated New York’s franchise law principles and whether the owner could secure continued rights under the franchise agreement. After a full legal review and strategic litigation, the franchisee retained the ability to continue operating the franchise location and obtained judicial recognition of contractual protections available under New York law.

Bribery Charge Defense Jail Sentence Reduced to Probation

Facing a bribery charge in New York can be overwhelming, especially when a first instance court has already imposed a jail sentence. This case study explains how a defendant accused of accepting unlawful financial benefits received a significantly reduced outcome on appeal.The defense team focused on the structure of bribery charge laws under New York Penal Law, the absence of active solicitation, documented remorse, and measurable efforts toward restitution. These components were essential in persuading the appellate court that the prior sentence was excessive and required modification.Throughout this matter, the defense strategy remained anchored in New York’s statutory framework governing official misconduct and bribery charge allegations, ensuring that all arguments were legally accurate and persuasive.