Case Results

Car Accident Settlement | SJKP Resolved Motorcycle Collision

Car accident settlement strategy plays a critical role in New York cases where negligence charges are closely tied to whether the injured party seeks criminal action.In this case, the client faced allegations stemming from a motorcycle collision involving a centerline violation, which caused significant injury to another rider.Under New York practices, cases involving negligence and serious physical injury often proceed unless a car accident settlement or similar agreement is reached.Because the situation involved a severe injury, the defense team determined that completing a car accident settlement was essential to avoid escalation into criminal charges.Through structured negotiations and comprehensive compensation, the case ultimately concluded with a prosecutorial dismissal.

Corporate Merge Legal Advisory for Merger Agreements

A corporate merge in Washington D.C. requires precise drafting, procedural compliance, and a careful review of governing documents to ensure a valid and efficient transaction. In this case study, a corporate client preparing for an absorption type merger sought comprehensive legal advisory services to examine draft merger agreements, review corporate governance documents, and confirm that the transaction aligned with all District of Columbia corporate requirements. Through structured analysis and targeted recommendations, the attorney supported the client in completing a smooth and compliant corporate merge. The following sections outline the advisory process, legal considerations, and the successful outcome.

First Time Theft Offense Non Prosecution Defense

A first time theft offense in Washington D.C. can create serious risks for a young professional, including barriers to federal or District government employment where background checks evaluate both convictions and arrest histories. In this case study, a first time theft offense triggered significant anxiety for an aspiring public sector applicant who feared that even a misdemeanor level theft allegation could prevent him from continuing his exam preparation and qualifying for entry level recruitment. Washington D.C. classifies theft under D.C. Code § 22-3211 and § 22-3212, which authorize penalties ranging from fines to possible incarceration, meaning an improperly handled first time theft offense can have outsized consequences for an individual building a government track career. This case study explains how careful legal structuring, immediate corrective action, and complete documentation enabled a favorable outcome that allowed the client to continue pursuing public sector employment.

Criminal Lawyer Secures Dismissal in Child Abuse Case

A criminal lawyer in New York was asked to defend a client who had been accused of child abuse following a physical intervention intended to stop an altercation between children. The allegation placed the client at serious risk of criminal charges, employment consequences, and long term reputational harm. Understanding that New York Penal Law treats physical contact with a minor with heightened scrutiny, the criminal lawyer immediately began a detailed investigation to establish context and intent. Through structured evidence collection, legal positioning, and communication with the complainant’s family, the criminal lawyer succeeded in guiding prosecutors toward a non criminal disposition specifically, a declination to prosecute. This case study explains how that result was achieved within the framework of New York child abuse related offenses.