Case Results

Habitual Theft | Non Prosecution Through Legal Strategy

When an individual is accused of habitual theft, the legal consequences can be severe, including the possibility of incarceration and long-term criminal record implications. In this case, a client facing a pattern of shoplifting incidents sought representation after multiple alleged thefts were captured on CCTV at a local supermarket. The situation escalated from what began as an accidental failure to pay for a small item to a series of intentional acts. The client, deeply concerned about the likelihood of punishment for habitual theft, turned to SJKP for urgent legal support.Through a tailored defense strategy, review of mitigating circumstances, and structured negotiations with involved parties, SJKP successfully secured a non-prosecution outcome for the client. This case demonstrates how early interventionand a well-prepared defense can significantly influence the outcome of habitual theft allegations in New York.

Business Consulting for Cross Border Acquisition Finance

In this case study, we explore how structured business consulting enabled a New York–based financial institution to complete a complex cross border acquisition with stability and legal compliance. The transaction required a multifaceted legal and financial approach due to foreign exchange regulations, multiple creditor interests, and the layered structure of an acquisition SPC funded by global investors. Through comprehensive business consulting, the client successfully mitigated risks, negotiated favorable terms, and aligned the transaction with New York regulatory standards.This case demonstrates why acquisition finance transactions demand strategic coordination, diligent contract management, and experienced advisory support.

Merger Strategic Acquisition of AI Startup

This case study examines how a corporate attorney in Washington, D.C. guided a client through a complex merger involving the full acquisition and absorption of an artificial intelligence startup. The acquiring company, referred to as Company A, sought to expand into new technology-driven business areas and identified the startup as an ideal opportunity due to its innovative AI solutions and strong long-term scalability.Despite its strengths, the startup suffered from operational instability caused by delayed external funding. These difficulties made a full acquisition and subsequent merger the most effective strategy for Company A to secure talent, proprietary algorithms, and technological capabilities.Because the transaction involved valuation of intangible assets, structural design of the merger, and coordination among multiple stakeholders, Company A requested legal support to ensure compliance with Washington, D.C. corporate law and to execute the merger efficiently.

Aggravated Theft Defense in Washington D.C.: Dismissal Decision

Aggravated theft allegations in Washington D.C. carry severe criminal consequences, including the possibility of felony charges, extended probation, and permanent records that may impact employment and immigration status. In this case study, we explore how a defendant facing aggravated theft worked with an experienced theft defense attorney to secure a favorable outcome. Throughout the investigation, negotiation process, and legal analysis, strategic advocacy played a decisive role in ensuring that the prosecution opted for a non-prosecution resolution. This case illustrates how early intervention, restitution, and evidence-based mitigation can significantly influence legal outcomes in aggravated theft matters.