Case Results

Aggravated Assault Defense Resulting in Full Acquittal

In this case study, we examine how a strong and well-structured legal strategy led to a Not Guilty verdict in a complex aggravated assault prosecution in New York.Our client was charged with aggravated assault involving a deadly weapon—a knife—after an altercation originating outside a bar.Facing a potential sentence of up to 20 years, he rejected the State’s plea offer of 15 years, firmly maintaining that the incident was self-defense.Because New York law requires the State to prove every element of aggravated assault beyond a reasonable doubt, our defense team prepared a meticulous factual and legal analysis.The client’s insistence on truth and the evidence showing the complainant’s drug- and alcohol-induced aggression became central to demonstrating the lack of criminal intent.Ultimately, a five-day jury trial concluded with a complete acquittal.

Embezzlement Defense Lawyer Assists Embezzlement Case

When an employee is accused of workplace theft or misappropriation, immediate and strategic legal action becomes critical. In this case study, our team acted as the primary embezzlement defense lawyer, guiding a New York employee through a sensitive internal investigation initiated by the employer. The matter required careful navigation of New York Penal Law, employment regulations, and corporate investigation procedures.Throughout the representation, the embezzlement defense lawyer focused on inadvertent admissions, preserving evidence, and coordinating or managing all communications. This structured approach ensured that the client avoided escalation to criminal charges while maintaining employment related protections.

Debt Collection Advisory for $3 Billion Bond Offering

In this case, we explore how a strategic debt collection advisory supported a client involved in a large scale $3 billion bond issuance governed by U.S. securities regulations. The engagement required addressing regulatory complexities, ensuring compliance with Washington D.C. legal frameworks, and designing a structure that aligned with federal securities requirements related to disclosure, enforcement, and investor protection. Through the professional debt collection lens, this matter demonstrates how proper structuring, compliance analysis, and risk mitigation can prevent downstream disputes and enhance financial stability for issuers and investors. The advisory team approached this debt collection case by closely analyzing the intersection between bondholder rights and securities law obligations. Because the District of Columbia requires adherence to federal anti fraud principles, accurate disclosures, and transparent compliance procedures, the legal analysis had to be comprehensive. This matter shows how debt collection strategy plays a crucial role in shaping the enforcement rights connected to large scale bond issuances.

Cybercrime Case Non Prosecution for Man Accused of Cyberbullying

A growing number of digital harassment cases across New York has elevated the demand for strong legal defense strategies tailored to cybercrime matters. This case explores how a defense team successfully resolved a cyberbullying related cybercrime allegation involving a man in his 30s who had engaged in repetitive and harmful online behavior. In handling this cybercrime matter, the legal team closely examined statutory requirements, evidentiary burdens, and procedural safeguards under New York law.Through strategic negotiation and legal analysis, the attorney helped the client minimize exposure under New York’s cybercrime statutes and facilitated a favorable resolution without a criminal conviction. The following sections detail how the cybercrime defense was structured and what legal steps were taken from intake to case closure.