Case Results

Trespass Complaint Form defence case | Mistaken Hospital Room Entry Decision not to forward

In Washington D.C., allegations related to unlawful entry or trespass frequently begin when a complainant files or prepares a trespass complaint form alleging that an individual entered a space without lawful authority. While D.C. law under D.C. Code § 22-3302 (Unlawful Entry) governs these cases, prosecutors do not automatically pursue charges without evidence of intent, notice, and willful noncompliance. In this case, a defense attorney successfully prevented criminal charges from being filed after demonstrating that the client’s accidental entry lacked the intent required to support a criminal trespass allegation. This case shows how proper legal guidance, factual clarification, and review of evidence can prevent misuse of the trespass complaint form process and avoid unjust outcomes under D.C. law.

Investment Fraud Defense in New York Non Prosecution Secured Through Strategic Representation

Allegations involving investment fraud in New York frequently arise when informal fundraising, personal loans, or community based investment arrangements are misinterpreted as unlawful solicitations. Because New York law strictly regulates unlicensed investment activities and prohibits fraudulent representations made in connection with the offer or sale of financial interests, individuals can face criminal exposure even when they did not intend to mislead anyone.This case study presents a comprehensive analysis of how a New York defense attorney resolved serious allegations involving investment fraud and an unlicensed investment type activity without prosecution. It also illustrates how early intervention, accurate financial tracing, and a clear demonstration of the client’s non-involvement can dismantle the factual basis of criminal liability.

Assault Sentencing in Washington D.C. | Defense Resulting in a Non Custodial Penalty

In Washington D.C., assault charges can lead to significant criminal exposure because District law treats any intentional or offensive physical contact as a potential violation of D.C. Code § 22-404. Even first time offenders may face the risk of incarceration depending on the degree of force involved, the extent of injury, and the presence of aggravating factors.This case study explains how a defense attorney successfully mitigated sentencing outcomes for a university student charged with simple assault after a mutual altercation escalated on campus property.The analysis highlights how early legal intervention, factual development, and mitigation strategy can reduce custodial risk in an assault sentencing matter under Washington D.C. law.

Corporate Division in Washington D.C. Structuring a Successful Separation and Investment Transaction

In Washington D.C., a corporate division involving the creation of a new subsidiary through an asset transfer must comply with the statutory framework of the District’s Business Corporation Act, including provisions governing dispositions of assets, shareholder approval, fiduciary obligations, and disclosure requirements. This corporate division case study illustrates how a D.C. corporate attorney assisted a mid sized company in separating its rapidly growing business unit and establishing an investment ready subsidiary while carefully aligning the steps of the transaction with applicable governance rules. Because corporate division in Washington D.C. involves legal scrutiny relating to board determinations, shareholder rights, and regulatory disclosures, the attorney ensured that every aspect of the restructuring reflected statutory compliance and minimized litigation risk.