Case Results

Sentence for arson: Secured a Lenient Outcome in a Mental Health-Related Fire Case

The question of what a sentence for arson looks like in New York often depends on the defendant’s intent, mental state, and the actual harm caused. This case involved a client who impulsively ignited dry straw in a public park on a windy day, resulting in burned tree bases and approximately 300 square feet of scorched landscaping. Although no one was injured, the incident triggered a serious criminal investigation because New York treats arson-related conduct strictly, even when damages appear minimal.

Aggravated Assault Offense Defense | Achieving a Non Prosecution

In Washington D.C., an aggravated assault offense allegation can create substantial criminal exposure because the District treats assaults involving dangerous weapons or conduct creating a significant risk of bodily injury as serious felony level matters. Even where no physical contact occurs, the presence or threatened use of an object that may be deemed a “dangerous weapon” can elevate a simple altercation into a far more serious offense under D.C. Code § 22-404. This case explains how defense counsel helped a client avoid prosecution after being wrongfully accused of aggravated assault, eventually securing a favorable outcome based on factual clarification, mitigation strategy, and a verified absence of harmful intent.

Cyber Phishing: New York Employee Avoids Felony Conviction After Unknowingly Assisting Scam Operation

When people suddenly find themselves investigated for Cyber Phishing, many are shocked to learn that even unintentional involvement in a scam network can lead to serious criminal exposure.In this New York case, a young employee at a small mobile phone shop was accused of assisting a Cyber Phishing ring by opening fraudulent phone accounts later used for scam activities.During early consultations, the client insisted that he never intended to help criminals and had simply followed the instructions of his supervisor, believing he was performing ordinary retail tasks.Through targeted legal strategy, evidence-based argument, and careful positioning of lack of intent, the defense was able to reduce the potential consequences and avoid a felony conviction despite the Cyber Phishing allegations.

Breach of Confidentiality Defense in New York After Employment Separation

A breach of confidentiality allegation in New York can escalate quickly into a civil or criminal exposure if a former employer believes proprietary business information or client data was improperly used.This case analysis explains how a former employee accused of disclosing client information to a competing business secured a non prosecution outcome based on insufficient evidence.Because confidentiality disputes often involve overlapping issues of client contact, competitive employment, and alleged misuse of business information, a structured defense grounded in New York legal standards is essential.The following content outlines how the defense reviewed the facts, evaluated statutory requirements, analyzed the absence of confidential information use, and ultimately demonstrated that no breach of confidentiality occurred.