Drug Trafficking

In Washington D.C., drug trafficking charges cover a wide spectrum of conduct, with the severity heavily influenced by several key factors. Due to its significant public safety implications, trafficking is always treated more severely than personal use, often involving mandatory minimum prison terms.

• Type of Substance: The drug's classification (e.g., Schedule I to V, such as heroin, fentanyl, or cocaine) significantly affects the potential punishment.
• Quantity Involved: Amounts exceeding reasonable personal use thresholds are crucial evidence for "intent to deliver," automatically elevating the charge.
• Location of the Offense: Committing the crime near protected zones (like schools) can trigger severe "drug-free zone" sentence enhancements.
• Aggravating Factors: Involvement of firearms, minors, or organized criminal networks leads to substantially enhanced federal or local charges.

Under both D.C. and federal statutes, penalties for drug trafficking are strictly determined by the substance and the weight involved. Convictions for trafficking substantial quantities of Schedule I or II drugs often result in statutory mandatory minimums of 5 to 10 years. Federal cases typically result in the most severe sentences with limited access to parole.

The court uses the D.C. Voluntary Sentencing Guidelines to determine a final sentence by carefully weighing specific factors. Aggravating factors, such as operating in a school zone or using a weapon, are primary targets for prosecutors seeking maximum penalties. Conversely, a defense attorney focuses on mitigating factors like a limited role in the crime or a clean prior record to argue for a reduced sentence.

Aggravating Factors:

• Proximity to Protected Locations: Trafficking near schools, playgrounds, or youth centers.
• Role in Offense: Leadership role in the distribution network.
• Use of Force: Offense involving the use or threat of firearms or violence.
• Criminal History: Repeat felony drug convictions or gang affiliation.
•  

Mitigating Factors:

• Limited Participation: Demonstrating a minor or minimal role in the criminal enterprise.
• Cooperation: Providing substantial assistance to law enforcement in investigating others.

The highest priority following an arrest must be to protect your Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, as any statements can be used as evidence of guilt. Maintaining complete silence and avoiding all communication with co-defendants or potential witnesses are paramount to protecting your case.

• Exercise Your Right to Remain Silent: Politely refuse to answer any police questions until a defense lawyer is physically present.
• Do Not Consent to a Search: Clearly state that you do not consent to any search of your person or property, forcing police to obtain a legally valid warrant.
• Avoid Contact with Co-Defendants: Any communication can be monitored or used to imply conspiracy, so all such contact must be strictly avoided.

Due to the severity of trafficking charges, securing experienced legal defense is essential to protect your freedom. A defense attorney will immediately investigate law enforcement’s conduct to challenge procedural missteps and constitutional violations. Their objective is to undermine the prosecution's case by challenging the evidence, negotiating a reduced charge, or moving the court to suppress unlawfully obtained evidence.

• Challenge Illegally Obtained Evidence: Filing a motion to suppress evidence seized during an unlawful search or traffic stop (a Fourth Amendment violation).
• Negotiate Plea Deals: Seeking a plea bargain for reduced charges or a more lenient sentence recommendation from the U.S. Attorney.
• Challenge Essential Elements: Arguing that the prosecution failed to prove the required element of "intent to distribute."

Since the government bears the full burden of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, a strong defense strategy will aggressively attack this burden. The defense will challenge the accuracy of the evidence and the interpretation of the defendant’s actions, focusing on legal technicalities and constitutional rights.

• Challenging Possession or Control: Arguing that the defendant did not have actual knowledge or control over the drugs found (e.g., they were in a communal space).
• Lack of Intent to Distribute: Arguing that the quantity of drugs found was strictly for personal use, not for sale.
• Unlawful Search and Seizure: Raising Fourth Amendment violations due to illegal stops or searches without probable cause or a valid warrant.
• Defense of Entrapment: Arguing that law enforcement improperly induced or coerced a person to commit a crime they were not predisposed to commit.