1. Elements of Breach of Trust Washington D.C. | Client Background and Initial Investigation
Early Warning Signs of Entrusted Authority Misuse
The employee held a senior role and was entrusted with access to sensitive client files, pricing models, and strategic project documents.
Although officially assigned to a high priority engagement, the employee’s output declined while system logs showed extensive after hours activity.
Management initially suspected inefficiency, but the pattern suggested intentional diversion of time and resources.
Given the employee’s level of trust and access, the client authorized a formal forensic review of the company issued laptop.
2. Elements of Breach of Trust Washington D.C. | Legal Standards Applied to the Case
District Statutes Governing Entrusted Property and Digital Misuse
Under D.C. Code § 22-3211, theft includes the knowing exercise of unauthorized control over another’s property or services.
When an employee exceeds the scope of entrusted authority for personal benefit, prosecutors assess whether the conduct demonstrates intent, lack of authorization, and resulting harm.
Where digital systems are involved, D.C. Code § 22-3227.01 et seq. Further addresses unauthorized access, copying, and transmission of electronic data.
These provisions collectively frame how the elements of breach of trust are proven in modern employment based investigations.
3. Elements of Breach of Trust Washington D.C. | Laptop Forensics Strategy and Findings
Identification of Non Business Activities and File Misuse
A forensic image of the laptop was created using industry standard write blocking protocols.
Analysis revealed that a substantial portion of the device’s usage occurred during compensated work hours and was unrelated to firm business.
Over one thousand files were linked to an external venture operated by an individual closely associated with the employee.
This pattern supported the conclusion that entrusted company resources were knowingly repurposed for unauthorized objectives.
Evidence of Data Transfers and External Dissemination
Investigators documented repeated exports of internal client lists, draft proposals, and financial projections.
These materials were transmitted to personal email accounts and third party cloud platforms without authorization.
System logs and metadata established a consistent timeline of deliberate activity rather than inadvertent error.
The evidence directly addressed core elements of breach of trust, including intentional misuse and exposure of company assets.
4. Elements of Breach of Trust Washington D.C. | Case Outcome and Evidentiary Significance
12 Dec, 2025
