Case Results

Summary Order | Overturned a Drunk Driving Fine

When you receive a Summary Order in the mail after a drunk driving arrest, it can feel as though the case is already finished and decided.In this New York case study, a professional driver contacted our team after being served with a fine-based Summary Order for an alleged alcohol-related driving offense.The client believed the BAC reading was barely over the legal threshold and that the timeline and science of alcohol absorption had been ignored.Rather than treating the Summary Order as the end of the case, we treated it as the starting point for a full evidentiary challenge.By attacking the reliability of the BAC at the time of driving and emphasizing the prosecution’s burden of proof, we transformed a routine Summary Order into a full trial acquittal, allowing the client to keep their license and clean record.

Top Rated Criminal Law Firm New York Touching Stalking

A top rated criminal law firm in New York was retained to defend a young professional who faced charges of forcible touchingand stalking under New York Penal Law. The allegations placed the client at significant risk because these offenses may result in criminal convictions, mandatory counseling, and long term reputational harm. The legal team undertook a comprehensive factual review, strategic negotiations, and mitigation planning to secure a non incarceratory outcome. Although the prosecution initially considered seeking enhanced penalties due to the persistence of the alleged conduct, the defense structured its approach around statutory analysis, corroborating evidence, and the client’s rehabilitative steps. Through this methodical strategy, counsel achieved a sentence consisting of a fine without probation or jail, an outcome that reflects how targeted advocacy can reshape a complex accusation.

Justifiable Defense | Avoided Criminal Liability

When an unexpected physical incident occurs aboard a commercial aircraft, law enforcement and federal aviation guidelines often treat even minor contact as a potential safety threat.In this case, our client sought urgent legal assistance to assert Justifiable Defense after being accused of in-flight assault.The situation escalated rapidly from a seat-recline disputeto a criminal investigation upon landing at JFK Airport.Because the client was a public employee, any conviction involving a suspended sentence carried the risk of automatic employment termination.This made a Justifiable Defense strategy essential, not only to avoid a criminal record, but also to protect the client’s career and livelihood.Our New York defense team reconstructed the incident, applied New York–specific defensive doctrines, and built a compelling Justifiable Defense argument, ultimately securing a resolution that preserved both freedom and professional status.

Perjury Defense Leads to Non Prosecution

Allegations of false reporting and perjury in New York can carry serious legal consequences, especially when they arise after an acquittal in a sexual assault case. Prosecutors focus on whether the original complaint was intentionally false and whether statements made under oath reflect deliberate deception. In this matter, a New York perjury attorney represented a client who had reported sexual assault and was later accused of false reporting and perjury. After reviewing evidence, clarifying the client's good faith basis for the initial report, and presenting mitigating documentation, counsel secured a non prosecution decision, allowing the client to avoid criminal charges and move forward.