Case Results

Top Criminal Law Firm Washington DC Stalking Assault Defense

A top criminal law firm in Washington D.C. was retained to defend an individual charged with stalking and misdemeanor assault under D.C. Code § 22-3133 and § 22-404(a)(1). The case involved a deteriorating personal relationship that escalated into repeated unwanted contact and an emotional confrontation resulting in minor physical injury. Because stalking charges in the District often hinge on patterns of conduct that cause fear or emotional distress, early intervention was essential to control the narrative and prevent enhanced penalties. The defense team reconstructed the timeline, addressed the client’s conduct within the statutory framework, and ultimately secured a modest monetary penalty rather than a harsher criminal outcome.

Complaint Attorney: Charges for a Landlord’s Fraudulent

When a tenant in New York reasonably relies on a landlord’s representations, the law requires that those statements be truthful, accurate, and complete.In this case, our client learned months after signing a lease that the property was already encumbered by a substantial mortgage and in active foreclosure proceedings. After losing both the apartment and a $60,000 security deposit, the client contacted our Complaint Attorney team for immediate legal assistance.Through investigation, evidence development, and a detailed criminal complaint, our attorneys helped the client pursue justice and ensured that the landlord’s deception resulted in formal prosecution.This case highlights how a Complaint Attorney in New York can intervene when fraudulent real-estate conduct causes serious financial and housing harm.

Best Corporate Law Firm Washington DC Minority Investment

A best corporate law firm in Washington D.C. was engaged to advise a rapidly expanding regulatory technology company (“the Company”) and its founder on a minority growth investment from a U.S. based private equity fund (“the Investor”). The transaction, valued at approximately $55 million, required complex structuring to ensure compliance with District of Columbia corporate law and federal competition requirements. The Company, founded a decade earlier, had experienced accelerated demand for its automated reporting and cross border compliance systems, prompting the founder to seek external capital for the first time.The legal team’s role encompassed business entity governance under the D.C. Business Corporation Act of 2010 (D.C. Code Title 29), review of competition implications under the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1–3 and negotiation of shareholder level protections to preserve strategic control. As a result of the engagement, the transaction closed without regulatory challenge, and the Company secured the financial capacity to expand product development and scale operations across North America.

Cyberbullying Defense for Online Harassment Charges

Digital communication allegations in New York can result in criminal exposure when online interactions become repetitive, unwanted, or appear threatening. Even misunderstandings may escalate into accusations of cyberbullying or aggravated harassment if the complainant perceives fear or intimidation. In this matter, a New York cyberbullying attorney represented a client accused of multiple online offenses and successfully reduced the outcome to a minimal monetary penalty, avoiding the harsher consequences the client initially feared.