Case Results

Startup Company Intellectual Property Legal Advisory

A startup company operating in Washington, D.C. faces unique intellectual property challenges because early stage innovation is highly vulnerable to competitive infringement risks and disputes arising from rapid technological growth within the District. The local business environment attracts research institutions, federal agencies, contractors, and technology driven enterprises, making IP protection an essential component for any startup company. This case study illustrates how a Washington D.C. based startup sought legal advisory services to strengthen its patent position, prevent unauthorized use of its technology, and navigate the federal IP processes that apply within the District.

Goods Sales Agreement: Solved Goods Sales Agreement Dispute

Businesses operating in Washington, D.C. frequently rely on a goods sales agreement to govern supply relationships and ensure prompt payment for delivered products. When a buyer fails to pay despite receiving goods, the seller may face financial strain, disrupted cash flow, and potential disputes over product quality or performance.

Crypto Trading Fraud Case Non Prosecution

Navigating a crypto trading fraud investigation in New York requires a defense strategy grounded in accurate financial analysis, digital asset tracing, and a deep understanding of New York’s criminal statutes governing fraud and investment schemes. In this case, our client faced allegations involving crypto trading fraud after being accused of misleading investors and facilitating unauthorized fund transfers. With the stakes involving potential felony charges and civil liability, our defense team focused on a fact driven analysis to demonstrate that the client was not a perpetrator, but rather a secondary victim caught in a broader fraudulent scheme. Ultimately, we secured a non prosecution outcome, enabling the client to avoid criminal liability and reputational harm associated with crypto trading fraud allegations in New York.

Car Accident Attorney NYC Failure to Take Action No Charges

A failure to act allegation under New York’s Vehicle and Traffic Law §600 can escalate quickly from a misunderstanding into a potential criminal matter. In this case study, a driver who had already provided the required identifying information was later accused of leaving the scene because he had temporarily moved away from the accident location.This case demonstrates how a car accident attorney NYC can successfully challenge assumptions of “intent to flee,” prove unavoidable circumstances, and secure a non charging outcome.It highlights the importance of early legal representation and clarifies how even minor contact accidents can trigger legal exposure under New York law when not handled properly.