Case Results

Incorporation Attorney Washington DC Global Joint Venture

Establishing a cross border joint venture requires a sophisticated understanding of corporate formation laws, shareholder rights, and regulatory obligations under the District of Columbia Business Corporation Act. In this case study, an incorporation attorney assisted a Washington D.C. based mid sized consumer goods company that sought to expand its manufacturing and distribution operations abroad by forming a global joint venture entity.Through comprehensive structuring, governance design, and regulatory compliance analysis, the incorporation attorney ensured a seamless incorporation process and built a strong legal foundation for the company’s long term international expansion.This case highlights how an incorporation attorney in Washington D.C. can mitigate risk, provide structural clarity, and support global business growth through precise and strategic legal advisory.

Company Acquisition Case Study in New York – Tender Offer Structure and Complete Subsidiary Integration

This company acquisition case study illustrates how a U.S.-based mid-sized company successfully pursued the acquisition of a publicly listed company through a structured tender offer in New York.Because company acquisition transactions involve complex regulatory, financial, and governance risks, the legal team developed a comprehensive strategy to navigate New York securities laws, disclosure obligations, shareholder-protection rules, and corporate-approval requirements.The attorney ensured that each phase of the company acquisition aligned with regulatory expectations and minimized transactional risks while securing a seamless transition into a wholly owned subsidiary.

Fraud Suspect | Fraud Suspect Accused of Loan Deception

When individuals are wrongfully accused of fraud, the consequences can be severe ranging from financial penalties to imprisonment. In this case, a fraud suspect approached SJKP seeking clarification on fraud elements under New York law and guidance on how to defend against allegations tied to a business loan dispute. The fraud suspect had been operating a food manufacturing and distribution business with partners when temporary financial difficulties led them to borrow funds from a private lender. Although the borrowers had consistently repaid principal and interest, the lender later accused them of fraud, claiming they “never intended to repay the loan.”Under New York fraud statutes, prosecutors must prove intentional deception at the moment the funds were obtained not simply a failure to repay at a later stage. This distinction is critical in cases involving a fraud suspect, as many disputes arise from business failure rather than unlawful conduct. SJKP recognized early that the essential question was whether the case involved civil non-payment or criminal fraudulent inducement. By applying precise legal analysis, SJKP successfully demonstrated that the fraud suspect lacked fraudulent intent, resulting in a complete acquittal.

Punishment for Theft Misunderstood Disposal Defense

In New York, determining the appropriate punishment for theft requires a careful assessment of a defendant’s intent, surrounding circumstances, and evidentiary context. This case study examines how our defense team successfully protected a client who mistakenly believed an electronic appliance was discarded property. Through a structured investigation and targeted legal arguments, we demonstrated that the client lacked the intent required for criminal liability. As a result, the case was declined prosecution, helping the client avoid the severe consequences typically associated with the punishment for theft under New York law. Our approach combined factual analysis, witness statements, site verification, and controlling case law to show that the client reasonably misinterpreted the situation. This case illustrates how misunderstandings can escalate into criminal accusations and how strategic advocacy can prevent disproportionate punishment.