Case Results

Contract Lawyer Exclusive Supply Agreement Review

This case study highlights how a contract lawyer in New York assisted a medical device manufacturer seeking to enter the European market through an exclusive supply agreement. The client, CEO of a mid-sized company specializing in advanced medical device development, was preparing to execute a fully English-language contract with a European distributor.However, the draft agreement contained provisions heavily favoring the distributor, including strict liability for defects, disproportionate penalties for delivery delays, and foreign jurisdiction mandates. Recognizing that internal review and simple translation would not adequately address these risks, the client requested comprehensive legal support from a contract lawyer.Through detailed analysis, negotiation strategies, and contractual restructuring, the client ultimately secured a fairer agreement and prevented long-term operational and financial exposure.

Criminal Defense Specialist – Insider Trading Defense

A criminal defense specialist is often required when federal or state agencies initiate insider-trading investigations involving publicly traded companies. In this case, our client, an employee of a NASDAQ-listed biotechnology corporation, faced severe allegations after purchasing company stock weeks before a multi-million-dollar licensing agreement was publicly announced. Because the timing of the trades raised suspicion, regulatory authorities began a formal investigation, placing the client at risk of criminal referral and substantial penalties.Our criminal defense specialist team immediately intervened, ensuring that the client’s rights were protected while developing a fact-driven strategy that ultimately resulted in a no-charges decision(“insufficient evidence”) from prosecutors. This case demonstrates how a carefully executed defense can dismantle assumptions frequently made in insider-trading investigations.

Franchise Disputes Case | Legal Advisory for a Victim of Franchise Fraud

Franchise disputes in New York frequently arise when franchisors fail to comply with mandatory disclosure obligations or engage in deceptive conduct during franchise solicitation. This case study discusses how our firm represented an individual who entered a franchise agreement based on material misrepresentations regarding a restaurant business. By applying New York’s franchise laws, fraud principles, contractual remedies, and statutory disclosure requirements, our team successfully secured a full refund of the client’s initial investment. This case highlights how early legal intervention, proper evidence collection, and strategic application of legal frameworks such as claims under fraud, rescission, and violations of New York’s franchise disclosure rules can dramatically change the outcome for prospective franchisees facing misleading sales tactics.

Embezzlement Prosecution New York Client Cleared

This case study examines how a corporate client facing an embezzlement prosecution risk in a New York construction dispute ultimately prevailed after being wrongfully accused of misappropriating a substantial amount of corporate funds. The client, a construction business owner, was unexpectedly targeted by a former subcontractor team leader who claimed that wages were withheld and converted for unauthorized corporate use. The legal defense centered on dismantling each aspect of the claim by clarifying contractual obligations, disproving ownership of the supposedly diverted funds, and demonstrating that the accusations lacked the factual basis required to sustain an embezzlement prosecution. Through a combination of factual analysis, legal strategy, and procedural defenses, our team secured a complete dismissal and fully restored the client’s professional integrity.