Case Results

What to Do If Scammed in Washington D.C. | A Case Study on Criminal Fraud Litigation Support

Experiencing fraud can be overwhelming, especially when the financial and emotional losses are significant. Understanding what to do if you are scammed is essential for protecting your rights and initiating appropriate criminal procedures. This case study illustrates how a victim in Washington D.C. pursued justice after being deceived in a real estate related financial transaction. The matter demonstrates how structured legal intervention, evidence based advocacy, and a comprehensive complaint strategy can lead to a conviction. Throughout this analysis, we examine key steps regarding what to do if scammed and how fraud victims can navigate D.C.’s criminal justice system to seek accountability. Washington D.C. criminalizes fraudulent schemes under D.C. Code § 22-3221 et seq., which covers obtaining property through intentional misrepresentation. When a scam involves deliberate deception for financial gain, the offender may face felony level penalties depending on the amount and circumstances. As shown below, timely reporting, organized documentation, and early involvement of legal counsel greatly influence the trajectory of a fraud complaint.

Defense Against a Spousal Coercion Charge in New York

This case study examines how defense counsel successfully resolved a coercion charge filed by a spouse during a highly emotional marital dispute. The client and his wife had long participated in intimate activities that involved inviting third parties—always after mutual discussion and shared agreement. According to the client, these arrangements were initiated voluntarily, with both spouses reviewing profiles and selecting participants together.Over time, however, the marriage deteriorated due to the wife’s gambling losses and later infidelity. When the client finally requested a divorce, the wife retaliated by filing a criminal complaint alleging a coercion charge, claiming she was forced into sexual acts without consent.The defense team’s task was to demonstrate that the allegations were inconsistent with the couple’s history, unsupported by evidence, and motivated by personal conflict rather than criminal coercion.

DUI Attorney Nearby | Repeat DWI Charge Against Delivery Worker, Suspended Sentence Secured

Repeat DWI allegations in New York frequently create significant sentencing exposure because state law imposes enhanced penalties on individuals who have a prior alcohol related driving conviction within the statutory look back period. A second offense with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.08 percent or higher may lead to mandatory fines, extended license revocation, ignition interlock device installation, probation supervision, and potential incarceration. For this reason, individuals with a history of license revocation or prior DWI convictions often require immediate assistance from a dui attorney nearby who can present credible mitigation and structured evidence demonstrating rehabilitation and hardship. In this case, a dui attorney nearby represented a motorcycle delivery worker charged with operating a vehicle while intoxicated for the second time an offense that exposed the client to a real possibility of jail under New York Vehicle and Traffic Law(VTL) §1192.

CFAA Violation | NYC Online Defamation Case Resolved with Minimal Penalty

Online misconduct allegations in New York can escalate rapidly especially when accusations involve reputational harm, unauthorized digital activity, or conduct that resembles elements associated with a CFAA Violation.In this case, a corporate employee was investigated after posting defamatory statements about a coworker on an online forum. Although the incident did not involve hacking or unauthorized access, investigators viewed the matter through a broader digital-misconduct lens, increasing the client’s legal exposure.Fearing harsh penalties, the client retained legal counsel to mitigate the consequences and navigate the reputational fallout. Through strategic advocacy, corrective action, and proactive negotiation, the defense team secured a minimal monetary penalty, successfully avoiding criminal charges or long-term repercussions.