Case Results

Corporate Attorney Unjust Enrichment Defense Victory

This case study presents a reconstructed but legally consistent example of how a corporate advisory attorney successfully defended a Washington DC based franchisor against an unjust enrichment claim brought by a former franchisee. The matter highlights how unjust enrichment theories are narrowly applied under District of Columbia law when an express contractual relationship governs the disputed payments. Through structured litigation strategy and evidentiary framing, the corporate attorney secured a complete dismissal of the plaintiff’s monetary claims.

employment lawyer Brooklyn | Wage Claim Case Full Recovery

This case describes how an employment lawyer Brooklyn successfully represented a restaurant employee in a wage claim dispute, ultimately securing a full recovery judgment for unpaid wages and statutory interest under New York labor standards. The matter highlights how delayed wages, even in small business employment settings, can escalate into formal litigation when informal remedies fail. It also demonstrates how strategic civil action by an employment lawyer Brooklyn can compel compliance and protect employee rights without procedural missteps.

Trusted Divorce Attorney Securing Full Claim Dismissal

This case study illustrates how a trusted divorce attorney in Washington DC successfully defended a spouse against a comprehensive divorce lawsuit. Through early intervention, evidence driven strategy, and strict alignment with District of Columbia family law principles, all claims for divorce, alimony, and property division were fully dismissed. The matter highlights how precise legal positioning can completely reverse litigation risk when fault based issues and equitable considerations are properly presented.

Custody Dispute New York Custody Modification Granted

This case study examines a successful custody dispute in New York in which a noncustodial parent obtained a court ordered modification of both legal and physical custody based on substantial changes in circumstances affecting the child’s welfare. The matter demonstrates how New York courts evaluate parental fitness, stability, and daily caregiving capacity under the best interests of the child standard. Through evidence driven advocacy, the court concluded that a custody modification was necessary to protect the child’s long term emotional and developmental well being.