Case Results

Unfair Dismissal Lawsuit | Misuse of Company Property

When an employee challenges a disciplinary termination, the outcome often hinges on whether the employer’s response was proportionate, lawful, and grounded in credible evidence. In this Unfair Dismissal Lawsuit case study, our firm represented a New York employer whose former employee sought to overturn a termination decision after being discharged for unauthorized use of company-controlled revenue at an entertainment facility operated as a secondary business line. The employee had previously been criminally convicted of misappropriation after allowing acquaintances to enter the facility multiple times without paying admission fees, violating internal financial controls. After the dismissal, he filed administrative appeals before state labor boards and then brought an Unfair Dismissal Lawsuit in court seeking reversal of the agency’s ruling. Through strategic intervention, evidentiary support, and careful alignment with New York employment-law standards, our firm preserved the employer’s original termination decision and secured full dismissal of the Unfair Dismissal Lawsuit.

Alcohol Related Violence Washington DC Suspended Sentence

Alcohol related violence incidents in Washington D.C. frequently escalate into criminal cases when police intervention is involved, particularly in nightlife and restaurant settings where alcohol consumption heightens emotions and reduces judgment. This case study examines a defense matter in which an individual was charged with interference with law enforcement and assault on a police officer following an alcohol fueled confrontation at a downtown dining establishment. Although the allegations carried the potential for incarceration under District of Columbia law, strategic legal advocacy focused on intent, proportionality, and mitigation resulted in a suspended sentence and probationary outcome. The case demonstrates how alcohol related violence charges can still be effectively managed through early intervention and precise statutory analysis in Washington D.C.

Occupational Disease | Reversed a Denial Knee Joint Injuries

When a long-term worker develops joint degeneration after decades of physically demanding labor, proving the condition as an Occupational Disease can be challenging especially when insurers characterize the injury as “purely degenerative” or age-related. In this New York case study, our firm represented a miner who spent 24 years performing high-intensity underground labor, including drilling, excavation, material handling, and equipment operation.Although he had already been approved for a shoulder-related Occupational Disease, his subsequent claim for bilateral knee damage was denied on the grounds that MRI findings reflected age-related degeneration. The worker appealed the denial and sought judicial review.Through medical-legal analysis, job-task reconstruction, and expert evaluation, we demonstrated that his knee injuries resulted from cumulative occupational stress, not natural aging. Ultimately, the court recommended reversal, and the workers’ compensation carrier granted full approval for the additional Occupational Disease knee conditions.

Computer Fraud Defense Leads to Non Prosecution Outcome

This case study examines a Washington D.C. based computer fraud investigation in which an individual was mistakenly implicated in a financial crime arising from electronic fund transfers. The matter highlights how computer fraud allegations in the District often hinge on proof of intent, knowledge, and participation rather than the mere movement of funds through a personal account. Through early intervention, careful evidence review, and fact driven advocacy, defense counsel successfully demonstrated the absence of criminal intent and secured a non prosecution decision. This case illustrates how strategic defense planning can resolve computer fraud investigations before formal charges are pursued.