Case Results

Corporate law : Defense Strategies in a Washington D.C. Trademark Infringement Criminal Matter

The following case study examines how our defense team safeguarded a client facing imprisonment for alleged trademark infringement connected to the sale of apparel bearing logos identical to internationally recognized luxury brands. Although trademark cases often arise in civil Corporate law disputes, Washington D.C. allows criminal enforcement when counterfeit goods are sold with intent to defraud consumers. This created substantial risk for the client, who already had a prior conviction.

Criminal Law Firm New York | Allegation of Non Consensual Contact Resolved Through Non Prosecution

Sexual misconduct allegations in New York often move quickly into formal investigations because the legal standard under New York Penal Law §130 emphasizes whether the complainant perceived the contact as non consensual rather than whether the physical interaction was forceful. Even minimal or ambiguous touching can be interpreted as unwanted sexual contact when the complainant later asserts discomfort, which heightens the urgency of a structured legal response. In this case, the criminal law firm New York represented a client reported for sexual misconduct following a misunderstanding during a private social interaction with a younger acquaintance. Although the client believed the contact was friendly and consensual in nature, the complainant later filed a police report alleging sexualized touching.

Car accident settlement agreement — Legal strategy for fatal pedestrian collision

This case study examines how a Washington D.C. accident attorney successfully secured a favorable settlement following a fatal pedestrian collision. The matter involved complex questions of driver negligence, evidentiary reconstruction, and valuation of wrongful death damages. Because the accident occurred in a crosswalk and involved a vulnerable road user, developing a persuasive liability theory was central to the Car accident settlement agreement strategy.

BAC level: Navigating a New York DUI Case with Mitigating Circumstances

A driver’s BAC level often becomes the central factor in a New York DUI case, shaping both the charges and the potential sentencing outcomes. New York’s Vehicle and Traffic Law establishes strict liability for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated, and courts tend to impose enhanced penalties when an accident and injury occur. Yet even in challenging circumstances, a carefully structured defense can present mitigating factors that significantly influence the final sentence.The analysis below reflects New York law and practical defense strategies used when dealing with elevated BAC level allegations.