Case Results

Criminal Defense Attorney in NYC | Non-Prosecution in an Employee Misappropriation & Grant Diversion Investigation

The following case study examines how a criminal defense attorney in NYC defended an employee who had been wrongfully implicated in an internal financial misconduct investigation. The matter involved allegations of employee misappropriation and unlawful diversion of grant funds within a nonprofit-style organization headquartered in New York City. Prosecutors initially considered potential charges under New York Penal Law provisions governing larceny (§155), criminal possession of stolen property (§165), and falsifying business records (§175) because the client's bank account was used as a temporary transfer point for organization related funds.Throughout the case, the criminal defense attorney in NYC demonstrated that the client acted under coercive pressure from a superior, did not obtain personal benefit, lacked criminal intent, and attempted to resist the unlawful directive. The attorney’s structured intervention ultimately persuaded prosecutors to decline prosecution, resulting in complete closure of the case without charges.This case highlights how employees in New York can become unintentionally entangled in organizational financial irregularities and how early representation is essential to preventing wrongful criminal exposure.

Fraud Report Form Case | Abetting Fraud Allegation, Suspended Sentence

In Washington D.C., allegations involving fraud, identity deception, and financial loss are prosecuted under several provisions of the D.C. Code, particularly § 22-3221 (Fraud) and § 22-1810 (Aiding and Abetting). When an individual unknowingly assists a criminal enterprise such as transporting unlawfully obtained funds or providing account access prosecutors may still pursue charges based on the person’s conduct, regardless of intent. This case examines how a defense team employed a structured legal strategy to protect a client who was unintentionally involved in a fraudulent operation after being misled by third parties. Through detailed factual investigation, mitigation development, and a comprehensive submission similar to a fraud report form, the defense secured a suspended sentence that prevented immediate incarceration.This matter highlights how early legal intervention, accurate documentation, and a well structured narrative addressing statutory elements are critical when navigating fraud related accusations in Washington D.C.

Criminal Defense Attorney New York | Non Prosecution in a Petit Larceny E Scooter Incident

The following case study examines how a criminal defense attorney in New York defended a client accused of petit larceny after temporarily taking an unattended electric scooter from a sidewalk. The matter shows how misunderstandings involving shared mobility devices can escalate into criminal allegations under New York Penal Law when property owners report an unauthorized taking. It also reflects how early intervention, structured mitigation, and accurate presentation of intent can lead to a non prosecution outcome. Throughout the case, the criminal defense attorney New York emphasized the absence of criminal intent, prompt return of property, and meaningful rehabilitative steps, all of which aligned with prosecutorial discretion standards within New York County.

Local Criminal Law Firm in Washington D.C. | Defending a Client in a Mistaken Tablet Theft Allegation

A local criminal law firm in Washington D.C. handled a theft allegation arising from a misunderstanding that occurred during a late night social gathering. The client faced potential prosecution under D.C. Code § 22-3211(a), which governs theft offenses within the District. Although the initial suspicion suggested intentional misappropriation of another person’s property, the case ultimately centered on the client’s impaired judgment, lack of criminal intent, and subsequent efforts to rectify the mistake. The legal response developed by the local criminal law firm focused on clarifying the client's mental state at the time of the incident, addressing the statutory elements required for a theft conviction, and presenting mitigating evidence that persuaded prosecutors to decline formal charges. Through a structured and fact-driven defense strategy, the firm successfully guided the client to a favorable result without criminal penalties.