Based on our recently accumulated litigation database, we provide customized solutions based on a thoroughly analyzed litigation database.

Showing 721 of 721 results.
Attempted Fraud Defense in New York | Complete Acquittal in a Forged Document & Attempted Fraud Investigation
Allegations involving forged documents and attempted fraud in New York often trigger intensive investigative steps because prosecutors rely heavily on documentary evidence when determining intent, authenticity, and the existence of a fraudulent scheme. When a dispute over financial settlements escalates into accusations of forgery, law enforcement typically conducts a detailed review of handwriting samples, notarized signatures, digital document properties, and corroborating circumstances. In this attempted fraud case, a New York criminal defense attorney successfully demonstrated that the contested documents were authentic, that the client acted within a legitimate financial claim, and that no fraudulent intent existed under New York Penal Law. Through a structured defense based on NYPL §170 (Forgery), §175 (Falsifying Business Records), and attempted fraud principles under §110.00, the attorney secured a full acquittal on all charges. This case study outlines how proper evidentiary development, forensic review, and contextual reconstruction can dismantle allegations that initially appear document-driven and prosecution ready.
DUI Attorney in Brooklyn NY | First Time DUI case Non Prosecution
A DUI investigation in New York can escalate rapidly because state and city law enforcement treat impaired driving allegations as high risk public safety offenses. Even without a motor vehicle accident, a driver who operates a vehicle while allegedly intoxicated may face charges under New York Vehicle and Traffic Law (VTL §1192), exposure to criminal penalties, administrative sanctions, license suspension, and permanent criminal record consequences. This case explains how a DUI attorney in Brooklyn NY reconstructed the incident, identified statutory weaknesses in the initial police assessment, demonstrated substantial mitigation, and ultimately secured a full non prosecution determination for a client who had been investigated for first time DWI. Through structured legal intervention, early submission of evidentiary materials, and proactive rehabilitation measures, the defense successfully prevented the matter from becoming a formal criminal case, thereby preserving the client’s driving privileges and future opportunities.
Criminal Defense Attorney NY | Assault Injury Case Resulting in Successful Prosecution
A violent assault occurring inside or near a hotel room in New York City raises immediate criminal exposure under New York Penal Law. When an offender intentionally strikes another person and causes physical injury, the conduct is generally charged as Assault in the Third Degree under NYPL §120.00. In more severe cases involving substantial pain or medically verified impairment, prosecutors may consider elevated charges under NYPL §120.05.In this case study, a criminal defense attorney NY was retained not by the accused, but by the victim who sought comprehensive legal representation to initiate a formal criminal complaint and ensure the assailant faced full legal consequences. The attorney reconstructed the events, gathered objective evidence from hotel surveillance systems, and prepared a legally sound affidavit to support prosecution within the NYC criminal justice system.This case demonstrates how victims of sudden, unprovoked violence in New York City can pursue a structured legal process to hold offenders accountable, and how properly drafted filings can greatly influence prosecutorial decisions.
Criminal Defense Law Firm | Duty Assault Allegation Suspension of Imposition of Sentence
In New York, workplace assault allegations involving supervisory personnel often trigger immediate criminal exposure because physical contact during the performance of duties can be interpreted as “intentional bodily injury” under New York Penal Law §§120.00 and 120.05. When the accused is in a position of authority and the complainant is performing a sensitive safety related assignment, prosecutors frequently treat the matter more seriously, raising the risk of arrest, career disruption, and long term criminal consequences. In this case, a criminal defense law firm in New York represented a security supervisor who was accused of striking an on duty guard during a workplace confrontation. Although the allegation initially appeared to support a misdemeanor assault charge, the defense reconstructed the incident, demonstrated the impulsive and non malicious nature of the conduct, and secured a conditional dismissal that allowed the client to avoid a criminal conviction entirely. This analysis provides insight into how an experienced criminal defense law firm in New York approaches sensitive workplace assault investigations, resolves credibility disputes, and mitigates the risk of lasting criminal exposure.