Case Results

Corporate Attorney Brooklyn | Legal Advisory for a Public Company Under an SEC Forensic Review

A public company facing a federal level accounting investigation encounters one of the most disruptive events in its corporate lifecycle because a Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) forensic review can immediately trigger delisting risk, investor distrust, and exposure to allegations of intentional overstatement. In this case, a corporate attorney Brooklyn provided high level legal guidance to an international mid cap issuer after an adverse tip to regulators alleged that the company intentionally inflated revenue. The matter escalated rapidly into an SEC directed forensic review and a parallel PCAOB inspection involving the company’s external auditor. This analysis explains how the corporate attorney reconstructed the financial narrative, identified inconsistencies in the whistleblower’s allegations, and implemented a mitigation strategy under U.S. securities law to prevent a trading halt or delisting. Through structured advocacy and compliance reconstruction, the legal team shielded the issuer from severe enforcement outcomes and preserved its listing status.

DUI Attorney NYC — Strategic Defense in a Complex Repeat Offense Case

A third DUI arrest in New York places a defendant at risk of severe penalties, including mandatory jail time, license revocation, and long-term criminal consequences. This case involved a client who initially attempted to negotiate privately with an alleged victim but ultimately chose lawful self-reporting with representation from an experienced DUI attorney NYC. What followed demonstrates how legal strategy, structured mitigation, and a careful analysis of New York DUI law can significantly influence sentencing outcomes.

Fraud complaint letter – Ponzi Investment Fraud Case in Washington, D.C.

In this case study, we examine a significant Ponzi style fraud targeting a D.C. area resident who entrusted large sums of money to an individual promising extraordinary investment returns. The client ultimately filed a fraud complaint letter after discovering the scheme and realizing the perpetrator had no intention or ability to return the borrowed funds.

Arrest for Assault Defence Case | Inflight Seat Dispute Resolved Through a Deferred Sentencing Outcome

In Washington D.C., criminal allegations arising from altercations on commercial aircraft are treated with particular seriousness because they raise concerns about passenger safety and potential disruption of aircraft operations. Even minor physical contact can quickly escalate into an accusation of assault under D.C. Code § 22-404, exposing the accused to arrest for assault and potential long term professional consequences. This case study examines how defense counsel navigated a complex inflight conflict, reframed the factual narrative, and secured a deferred sentencing outcome that avoided permanent criminal penalties.The matter demonstrates how early intervention, structured factual development, and strong mitigation can redirect an “arrest for assault” case toward a non incarcerative result, particularly where the conduct occurred under defensive or reflexive circumstances rather than malicious intent.